Geo-Estimation
Establishes where the photograph was taken.
Manta
Development previewA visual evidence model for work that gets questioned.
Manta establishes where a photograph was taken, resolves it to the street or the building, shows the evidence that led there, and never claims more precision than that evidence carries.
Approved organizations · No individual tier
01 / The model
Calling it a geolocation model undersells it: locating the photograph is where the work starts. Manta is for the cases where somebody will disagree with the answer.
Where an image was taken, from its content alone, with no metadata.
That answer down to the street or the building, rather than stopping at a radius.
The evidence that led there, so the conclusion can be argued with.
The precision it states limits what it may claim. No street in the evidence, no street in the answer.
02 / Three modes
Each mode answers a different question and fails differently, with one evidence chain running through all three. You choose the one that fits the work.
Establishes where the photograph was taken.
Resolves the candidate regions to the exact street or building.
Confirms a photo matches a specific property, down to the room.
Why Property-Verify is last
It is the only one of the three that ends at a front door. We could switch it on in more places than we have. We have not, because a tool that names the building in a photograph unsettles people, and it should. It runs only inside a reviewed workflow, for organizations we have checked, with a person reading the result.
03 / Results
Street-Match is evaluated on seven place-recognition benchmarks; geo-estimation on the OSV-5M test split. The full tables, sources and protocol are in the announcement.
Street-Match · Nordland · Recall@1
97.21%
+1.21 over the best other reported model (SAGE (8448-D), 96.0).
Leads on 2 of 7 benchmarks. Ranked #2 of 11 by mean Recall@1. Numerical leads, not established improvements beyond evaluation variability.
| Benchmark | Street-Match | Best other | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPED | 95.39 | SAGE (8448-D) 98.9 | −3.51 |
| Pitts30k | 94.95 | SAGE (8448-D) 95.8 | −0.85 |
| MSLS val | 94.60 | SAGE (8448-D) 94.5 | +0.10 |
| Nordland | 97.21 | SAGE (8448-D) 96.0 | +1.21 |
| AmsterTime | 74.25 | SAGE (8448-D) 83.5 | −9.25 |
| Tokyo 24/7 | 98.43 | EffoVPR 98.7 | −0.27 |
| SVOX | 98.74 | BoQ 99.0 | −0.26 |
Geo-Estimation · OSV-5M · share within distance
Median error 30.5 km vs 32 km (Chipoint-2 card)
45.77%
Within 25 km
+0.94 vs Chipoint-2
81.83%
Within 200 km
+0.73 vs Chipoint-2
92.57%
Within 750 km
+0.46 vs Chipoint-2
97.30%
Within 2,500 km
+0.48 vs Chipoint-2
Numerical leads; the smaller differences should not be read as established improvements beyond evaluation variability.
04 / Access
Enterprise organizations first, then selected pilots and research partners, then wider access. Controlled access is a stage, not a destination. Oceanir’s standard model stays the default across the app and the API.
It names the people who will use Manta and what they will use it for. The grant is scoped to that.
Enabled against a declared purpose, not switched on globally. Dense reference coverage today: Lisbon, San Francisco and Miami.
Manta runs where a person reads the result and is accountable for what it concludes.
05 / Limits
The people boundary
Manta answers where a photograph was taken. It is not built to find people, and we do not permit it to be used that way.
That is written into our terms and enforced in our test suite, not left to good intentions.
Including the ones you already know the answer to. We return exactly what Manta produces, including where it declines to commit.